Friday, September 10, 2010

Some recent kidsafe correspondence

This is from Susan to her boyfriend.  Note that the visit is confirmed.  That means that I did respond and say that no matter how much it makes me want to throw up, I will be there. 

So the visitation has been confirmed and I know of no reason that Kristen should not attend. It

would be appreciated if she would reply to Judy's e-mails.

>> Susan

>

> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry  (Must be nice to have a Blackberry and a new car!)

>> -----Original Message-----

> From: bothurcorp@yahoo.com  (Bothurcorp is the email he used to have when he was pretending to be a stockbroker and flushing my father's lifetime savings down the toilet.  He considered himself a corporation.  I guess he still does.  Perry Mason inc?)

> Lol, now this is getting silly. It was made very clear that I had to pay for both visits. I confirmed last Sunday. It would then be implied my understanding and compliance with the same.
As for Judge Frazzini, as the GAL I would hope that you have filed a contempt motion for Kristin
not complying. I did not go as the email I received from Robin was there was no visit. I did not
receive your email until I logged into my email on that Sunday. When there are so many cc's it goes straight to my spam folder. I have disable the filter for now.

> Tom

Do you think he has one of those little calendars that lets you learn a new big word a day?

I just love how I follow every little aspect of court orders, no matter how ridiculous and unjust they are, because I keep praying that righteousness will win out in the end, and watch him not follow anything and these people fall all over him. 

And Susan, it's Kristin with an "i."  How many times has it been spelled out in front of your face?

0 comments:

Post a Comment